The article linked below shows clearly that as long as the subsidized private auto has critical-mass as transportation and public-transit is "alternative" transportation, the discussion will be one-sided. Before we fight for rail, we have to break the critical-mass of the private auto. At that point, the extensive subsidy of the auto and sprawl will be revealed as a burden, an unnecessary burden.
Rail projects differ, but political divide follows unswerving tracks - JSOnline
Rail projects differ, but political divide follows unswerving tracks - JSOnline
No comments:
Post a Comment